Akair, Adel and Baej, Hesham (2021) The Impact of Coolant Temperatures on Various Cycle Parameters of NH3-H2O Absorption Chiller from Solar Source. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews, 7 (1). pp. 43-50. ISSN 2581-8368
116-Article Text-215-1-10-20220914.pdf - Published Version
Download (306kB)
Abstract
The cycles’ structure was based on recently published technical information of low-temperatures powered Ammonia-water (NH3-H2O) absorption chiller. The cycle was completely modeled using different components available within the refrigeration library of IPSEpro software package. Using the model a cold-water ammonia-water absorption chiller was examined and validated in accordance to the relevant thermodynamic laws and charts. A low-grade temperature solar resource was modeled to energise the proposed model. For water-cooled cycles, the rejected heat from the absorbers and the condensers was carried out by water, at an average fixed temperature of 25°C, pumped out from ground water. The results obtained show that when the Coefficient of performance (COP), heat inputs into the generator, and cooling mass flow rates are fixed, the cycle parameters are highly affected by variation of coolant temperature. For instance when cooling water temperature decreases. Also when cooling water temperature increase, the cycle pressure, usable chilled water temperature difference and desorber outlet temperature increase whereas mass concentration and refrigeration capacity decrease. The effectiveness of the generator inlet temperature (solar source) is a factor of the largest effect to the COP. The difference was 0.1401, 27.4%. The chilled water inlet temperature (underground water) is the second largest effect to the COP. The difference between the maximum and the minimum value is 0.0865 and the relative difference is 18.9% with cooling capacity 12 kW. The influence of evaporator temperature to the COP is also minimal with only 2.2% difference. The influence of absorber temperature and condenser temperature to the COP are almost identical, the relative difference is 19.2% and 18.9% respectively.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Apsci Archives > Energy |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email support@apsciarchives.com |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jan 2023 08:20 |
Last Modified: | 10 Feb 2024 03:59 |
URI: | http://eprints.go2submission.com/id/eprint/144 |